× We have recently moved to a new server. If you run into any issues, please let us know through the Contact Us link at the bottom of the page. Thanks for visiting RocketReviews.

Modification U.S. Army Patriot M-104 Cluster Modification

Modification - U.S. Army Patriot M-104 Cluster

Contributed by Ray King

Published: 2010-08-01
Manufacturer: Modification
Style: Cluster, Scale

Brief:
This is part 2 of the EMRR Challenge #7 as outlined I built this rocket as I wanted, making my own modifications. I like the look of the rocket so I didn’t modify that at all – I focused on adding more power. “Tim the Tool Man Taylor would be proud” – if you don’t understand this comment go watch some reruns for Tool Time. This rocket is a Semi-Scale version of the US Army Patriot Air Defense Missile. The rocket is designed to use an 18mm engine and 12” parachute recovery. I modified it so it now uses 2 -18mm engines and a 12-18” parachute.

Modifications:
I followed the instructions with a few exceptions. First I made the engine mount a 2 engine (18mm) cluster with no engine hooks. The centering rings few made from balsa hardened with epoxy. I also changed the shock cord attachment, rather than using the standard Estes I ran Kevlar to the engine mount (drilled a small hole in the top centering ring and tied the cord around the engine tube assembly). I also, added about .8 ounces of nose weight to ensure the rocket was stable. The rest of the assembly was per the instructions.

Construction:

  • 2 – BT-60 White Body Tube (6.625” Long)
  • 1 - Yellow Body Tube (3.25” Long)
  • 2 – Blue 18mm Engine Tube
  • 1 - Nose Cone (#72057)
  • 2 - Body Tube Couplers
  • 1 - Launch Lug – 2.375” Long
  • 1 - Std Engine Hook
  • 1 - Green Engine Block
  • 2 - 2 Engine Cluster Centering Rings (Made from .060” Hard Balsa)
  • Balsa Fins (3/32” Pre-cut Sheet)
  • 36” of Kevlar Shock Cord
  • 18” – 1/8” Shock Cord
  • 12” Plastic Parachute
  • Decal Sheet

In this case I didn’t finish this because I ran out of time to get my review complete so I chose to fly this naked. I did apply a couple of coats of Emery’s Wood Putty thinned with water to the tube and fins prior to assembly to the rocket. I found sanding these as components is a lot easier. My plan is to paint both rockets as the instructions outline – I will add some pictures of the painted versions to the flight log pictures.

Flight:

I flew this rocket only once because the filed was a little small for the altitude predicted. The maiden flight was done on 2 C6-5’s and did this rocket fly. Thankfully, I flew the single engine version first and was surprised by the altitude of the C6-5 so I changed from the 18” parachute to the 12” parachute. On 2 C6-5’s this rocket screamed to very high altitude – it took roughly 2.5 minutes until the rocket landed. I was going to fly 2 B6’4’s but after the first flight they would only be a disappointment. I will fly this rocket again on a bigger field once I paint it.

Recovery:

The recovery was prefect; it just took awhile for the rocket to land. Thankfully the wind was very light and the rocket landed in the field. {short description of image}

Summary:
If 1 engine = a Great Rocket; than 2 engine results in an even better rocket. For anyone who likes high flying I would definitely recommend this modification and the 12” parachute is fine.

Flights

comment Post a Comment