Manufacturer: | Scratch |
I wanted to build something. Something different. Something very different. But what? I had been reading G. Harry Stine's Handbook of Model Rocketry, and was thinking about stability. You need the weight up front, and the fin area out back. The motor is definitely the heaviest part, so it made sense to have that up front. But, you can't just stuff it way up inside the body tube because of the Krushnic Effect. So... what if it didn't have a body tube? What if I attached the fins some other way...? So, I present to you:
Why the "Mystery Rocket"? Well, because I built it in secret from my wife. I wouldn't let her see it at any stage of the construction. I had to think of something to call it when she asked about it, but I didn't want to use a name that would give it away. What can I say, the name just stuck. In fact, the first time she saw it was when I "unveiled" it at the launching field for it's first launch. As predicted, her first comment was "Is that even going to work?" I get that a lot.
The photo above was taken that first day. I hate painting, so I wasn't about to paint it until I knew it flew. Don't mistake my hate for painting with laziness, though. You'll notice that all the edges are rounded, and, though you can't tell from the photo, the fins are sanded to an airfoil shape. It's built with care, it's just not painted.
There were three big questions running through my mind before that first launch:
1) Would it be stable? I was pretty sure it would be just fine, with all the weight up front, and all that fin area way out back. Now, I'm convinced that it's actually quite overstable. But, this was my first "odd-roc", so there was that little inkling of doubt in the back of my mind.
2) Would it hold together? This was really my biggest concern. It's all just plain old yellow (carpenter's wood) glue construction, and those front struts have quite a load on them. There was only one way to answer this question...
3) What size engine should I use? I don't own a scale, so I have no idea how much it weighs. I figured I'd start with a 1/2A6-2 and work my way up.
Well, there should have been a fourth question, but I was so convinced that it wouldn't be a problem, that I really didn't give it much attention... Would the motor exhaust burn the lower structure?
Well, you can read the full launch report of that first launch, but I'll tell you now that the answers are Yes, Yes, At least a B6-4, and Yeah, a little bit, but not too bad.
Before the second launch, I painted it. I wanted the lower structure to have some resistance to scorching, so I used some flat black exhaust system spray paint (good to 1500 F) for the body tubes. I then painted the vertical struts day-glow orange (aka International Orange) for contrast. I didn't use any masking tape... I just let the two colors blend naturally in the middle of the fins and upper struts.
Here's a link to the second day's launch report for this rocket. Here are photos from the second launch day: launch photo #1, launch photo #2, recovery photo, and a close-up of it in flight. The close-up photo shows why there's some scorching of the lower structure, eh?
NOTE: Read all instructions before beginning so that you have some idea of what I'm getting at with each step. Feel free to modify the construction in any way you see fit. I only ask that if you do something cool or practical, please write to meand tell me about it! Note that at the bottom, I have a list of alternatives to the construction I've detailed here. Of course, I take no responsibility for anything you do.
Parts List:
Construction Supplies:
Construction Steps:
Alternative Construction Ideas:
If you want to be able to use 24mm engines (for D, E, and even F power), just substitute BT-50 tubing for the BT-20 tubing, and a PNC-50 nose cone for the PNC-20 nose cone. I'll probably try this soon, just to see if it holds together.
If you're worried about the struts holding onto the vertical rods with that much power, cut or drill slots in the rods and use "through-the-rod" strut attachment ;-). If you're worried about the struts holding onto the body tube you have two options. First, you could switch to using a body tube for the upper structure that is larger in diameter than your engine (say, BT-55 or BT-56 tubing), and use "through-the-wall" strut attachment. Second, if you still want to use a minimum-diameter body tube, drill two or three small holes in each strut, very near where they attach to the body tube, and then thread some of that 100lbs test line through the holes and around the body tube, to literally tie the struts together. Add a little epoxy to stiffen and strengthen the line, and you've got some very solidly attached struts, I suspect.
On the other hand, if you want to build a scaled down version to use 13mm mini engines (or 10.5mm micro engines), you'll probably have to find something much lighter than the 3/16" dowel used for the vertical rods, in addition to using small body tubes and smaller nose cone. I might try this using bamboo cooking skewers for the vertical rods.
If you're worried about the scorching of the lower structure there are two routes you can take. The first is to put more distance between the engine and the lower structure. You could easily put 2 more inches between them just by attaching the fins and struts farther apart on the vertical rods. Or you could go with longer vertical rods. But be careful about adding too much weight this way (hardwood dowels aren't light). Or you could the struts at more of an angle or mount them lower on the upper body tube. All these mods together could easily buy you 5 or 6 more inches of distance there (and could change the look of the rocket significantly... possibly for the better).
The second (and probably more elegant) solution to the scorching problem is to simply use a much larger piece of body tube (like BT-60 or BT-80) in the lower structure. That way, the hot engine exhaust should mostly just blow through the tube, rather than onto it. Be forewarned, however, that this will result in significantly less fin area, so it might become unstable by making this modification. If you're afraid of that, just make that piece of body tube and the fins taller to increase their total area. I'm pretty convinced that this thing is very over stable as it is now, though, so I wouldn't worry about it too much.
If you're just worried about melting or burning the lower launch lug, try epoxying a couple of small metal split rings to the fin/body tube joint to form the launch rod guide, instead of using a traditional launch lug. Don't stress too much about it, though, because I continue to launch the original, using just the upper lug, and it works just fine.
Unfortunately, the Mystery Rocket crashed and broke into several pieces at the 1997 Dec 7 launch when I tried to see how well it flew in the wind. It wasn't the wind's fault, though; I should have used something bigger than an A8-3 engine. The rocket got turned over before ejection, and fell into the chute, tangling the chute, and causing the crash.
I glued it all back together, and reinforced the new joints with strips of silk span. It held up wonderfully.
This rocket was, in some small way, inspired by that very first liquid-fueled rocket that Robert Goddard launched.
Description: | Front-mounted engine, three-shaft experimental rocket. See photo. |
Purpose: | To boldly go where no rocket (that I've seen) has gone before. |
Motors: | Well-flown on B6-4 and C6-5. Too heavy for a 1/2A6-2 or an A8-3. |
Max Altitude: | Not sure, let's say 300 feet on a B6-4, and maybe 500 feet on a C6-5. |
Length: | About 22 inches. |
Diameter: | Tubes: BT-20 Top tube is 6 7/8" long, bottom one is 2" long Total diameter: About 5 1/2 inches. |
Weight: | ??? |
Recovery: | 12" parachute |
Nose Cone: | Short cone, plastic |
Payload: | None |
Fins: | 3 forward struts, 3 1/4" x 1/2" balsa 3 rear fins, 3" x 2" balsa |
Notes: | Tons-o-fun!!! |
Skill Level: | Oh, about 3 |
Part Number: | None |
Price: | Oh, probably about $7 in parts. |
Sponsored Ads