× We have recently moved to a new server. If you run into any issues, please let us know through the Contact Us link at the bottom of the page. Thanks for visiting RocketReviews.

Scratch EAC Hyperion Original Design / Scratch Built

Scratch - EAC Hyperion {Scratch}

Contributed by Chan Stevens

Manufacturer: Scratch
(Contributed - by Chan Stevens - 09/20/08) (Scratch) EAC Hyperion

Brief:
1:8.15 scale of the Environmental Aeroscience Corporation's sounding rocket.

Construction:
This "scale bash" project can easily be built from common parts available in commercial kits. The attached RockSim file can be used for a shopping list, but the basic parts include:

  • PNC-20 Plastic nose cone (4:1 Ogive)
  • BT-20 body tube 24.15" long
  • 1/16" basswood fins (4)
  • 1/8" launch lug
  • BT-5 motor tube 4" long
  • 5/20 centering rings (2)
  • 10.5mm/13mm centering ring motor block
  • 12" chute
  • 20" 1/8" elastic shock cord
  • paper shroud
(Scratch) EAC Hyperion

I got the idea from Peter Alway's Scale Bash book, which included templates and the basic dimensional conversions. I have replicated almost all of that in a RockSim file for simulation and stability analysis.

The attached RockSim file can be used to print out fin patterns, which are cut from 1/16" basswood. Balsa can be used but would possibly flutter a tiny bit at that size. Note that on my model, I went a bit beyond the regular fins and made tiny fin mounting brackets by cutting small slivers from a spare BT-20 motor tube. The slivers are equal to the fin length and are about 3/32" wide.

To print the shroud, I recommend the free online tool linked through the EMRR site. The dimensions are 0.736" front diameter, 0.544 rear diameter, and length of 0.66".

Building the model is a skill level 2 and can be done in about 90 minutes at the worst. Start by inserting the smaller centering ring in the BT-5 using a spent casing to space it correctly--you want to leave 1/4" out for tape retention, as the boat tail leaves no room for a hook.

Next, form the shroud and use white glue to seal it. Slide it over the BT-5 with the aft end flush with the aft of the BT-5. Apply a thin bead of glue to the BT-5 near the forward end of the shroud and slide a 5/20 centering ring down the BT-5 until it just touches the shroud. Glue the other centering ring to the forward end of the BT-5. The completed assembly then slides into the BT-20 and is glued in place.

(Scratch) EAC Hyperion Using a wraparound fin guide (again, free online tool linked through EMRR or use an Estes marking tool if you do this before mounting the boat tail), mark a 4-fin pattern on the BT-20. Mount the fins (and brackets, if you choose to make them).

Mount a lug about 10" from the aft end on a line between fins.

A standard paper tri-fold for the shock cord should suffice.

Critical step: add a small amount of nose weight. On mine, it needed about 3 grams of clay in the nose to bring the CG to 13.5" from the nose tip (empty). RockSim thinks this is overstable, but long/skinny rockets need extra margin, especially if flying in higher winds.

Finishing:
For finishing, I painted everything with 2 coats of gray primer, then two coats of Krylon white gloss as a base. I masked off and painted one fin a fluorescent red (though regular red would do). I then masked that fin off, and painted the remaining 3 fins black.

For the nose cone, the Scale Bash book included a small pattern that could be used to print a shark's mouth and eyes. Rather than figure out how to transfer that to a decal somehow, I just drew it by hand in pencil a couple times before following up with a Sharpie.

Flight and Recovery:
Since it's a 13mm, the motor selection is pretty thin. I'd recommend going all the way up to A10-3T or A3-4T. I flew mine on an A10-3T on a perfectly calm day. The flight was absolutely straight although it was still coasting up a bit when the chute popped out. An A3-4T motor might be a better fit with less of a thrust spike for a longer flight and the longer delay would help.

The model simulates to about 350 feet, although I don't think it got anywhere near that altitude. More like 200-250.

Summary:
For PROs, I think I'd have to rate the simplicity of the construction for an easy scale model and the very nice flight. It's also a model that doesn't seem to show up in contests or sport flights very often, so it is certainly a bit off the beaten path.

CONs: somewhat tricky decoration of the nose, limited availability of good scale data, and having gone with 13mm motor, I'd suggest upscaling to 18mm for better motor flexibility would be a good idea.

comment Post a Comment